Key result
Tracking the motion of CRT pacing electrodes with a mapping system to derive contractility surrogates during implant was feasible, showing detectable differences across pacing configurations.
Why the study?
Is it feasible to characterize ventricular contractile patterns and derive contractility surrogates using an electroanatomic mapping system during CRT implant?
Is it feasible to characterize ventricular contractile patterns and derive contractility surrogates using an electroanatomic mapping system during CRT implant?
Tracking CRT pacing electrodes with a 3D mapping system during implant is a feasible method to derive real-time ventricular contractility surrogates.
BACKGROUND: Electroanatomic mapping systems track the position of electrodes in the heart. We assessed the feasibility of characterizing left ventricular (LV) performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant utilizing an electroanatomic mapping system to track the motion of CRT lead electrodes, thus deriving ventricular contractility surrogates. METHODS: During CRT implant, atrial, right ventricular (RV), and LV leads were connected to the EnSite NavX™ mapping system (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA). The relative displacement of electrodes was averaged over 10 cardiac cycles during RV, LV, and biventricular (BiV) pacing in DOO mode. Three contractility surrogates indicative of ventricular performance were extracted from the RV-LV distance waveform: systolic slope (SS), time to peak systolic contraction (TPSC), and fractional shortening (FS). RESULTS: In the 20 patients included, there were detectable differences in each of the three contractility surrogates responding to the different pacing configurations. Median SS varied 42%, median TPSC varied 35%, and median FS varied 19% across RV, LV, and BiV pacing interventions. The RV-LV distance waveform showed subtle sensitivity to varying pacing timing cycles when measured in a subset of patients. For all pacing configurations, RV-LV distance waveforms were stable during 2-minute recordings. CONCLUSIONS: Tracking the motion of CRT pacing electrodes with a mapping system to derive contractility surrogates during implant is feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niazi et al. (2015) studied Patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant (n=20). Tracking CRT lead electrodes with an electroanatomic mapping system vs. Different pacing configurations (RV, LV, and BiV pacing) was evaluated on Feasibility of deriving ventricular contractility surrogates (systolic slope, time to peak systolic contraction, and fractional shortening). Tracking the motion of CRT pacing electrodes with a mapping system to derive contractility surrogates during implant was feasible, showing detectable differences across pacing configurations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: