Key result
A survey of 52 physicians in Japan found that routine CRT optimization is performed by only 28.3%, limited by lack of time (71.2%), reliable methods (55.8%), and qualified staff (53.8%).
Why the study?
What is the current practice and what are the limiting factors of CRT device optimization among physicians in Japan?
Cross-Sectional (n=52)
What is the current practice and what are the limiting factors of CRT device optimization among physicians in Japan?
Repetitive CRT optimization is infrequently performed in Japan, primarily due to a lack of time, human resources, and reliable methods.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variable CRT optimization practices persist across Japan; leaves open need for standardized, evidence-based protocols.
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to be effective for patients with heart failure. However, despite data suggesting that routine atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay optimization may play significant roles in CRT, there is no standard on how and when the CRT device should be optimized. The aim of this study was to characterize the current practice of CRT optimization in Japan. Methods A survey was conducted to collect information on the procedural aspects of AV and VV delay optimization. The key survey items concerned what method is used for optimization, when optimization is performed, and what factors limit repetitive optimization. Results Fifty‐two physicians participated in the survey. Echocardiography was the chosen method for assessing AV and VV delays by 79.6% and 65.3% of physicians, respectively, and routine optimization was performed by 28.3%. The majority optimized the settings only once at pre‐hospital discharge or on an “as‐needed” basis. The factors limiting repeated optimization were the lack of available time (71.2%), qualified staff (53.8%), and reliable methods (55.8%). Conclusions Repetitive CRT optimization is infrequently performed in Japan. Lack of time, human resource, and reliable methods were the major factors affecting the number of routine CRT optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doi et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=52). Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization was evaluated on Procedural aspects of AV and VV delay optimization. A survey of 52 physicians in Japan found that routine CRT optimization is performed by only 28.3%, limited by lack of time (71.2%), reliable methods (55.8%), and qualified staff (53.8%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: