Key result
A multiscale computational model predicted that a clinically relevant dose of dofetilide increased arrhythmia vulnerability across all emergent TRIaD-linked parameters.
Why the study?
QT prolongation is too sensitive and not selective as an arrhythmia surrogate marker, leading to early elimination of potentially useful drugs during discovery.
Does simulated dofetilide increase arrhythmia vulnerability parameters in computational models of human ventricular cells?
Does simulated dofetilide increase arrhythmia vulnerability parameters in computational models of human ventricular cells?
A multiscale computational model successfully predicted dofetilide-induced cardiotoxicity from atomistic interactions to tissue-level rhythm disturbances, offering a potential tool for preclinical drug screening beyond simple QT interval measurement.
Multi-scale cardiotoxicity modeling may refine early drug screening beyond QT; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
SUMMARY We simulate and predict cardiotoxicity over multiple temporal and spatial scales from the drug chemistry to the cardiac rhythm. ABSTRACT Drug-induced proarrhythmia is so tightly associated with prolongation of the QT interval that QT prolongation has become widely accepted as a surrogate marker for arrhythmia. The problem is that QT interval as an arrhythmia indicator is too sensitive and not selective, resulting in many potentially useful drugs eliminated early in the drug discovery process. We first set out to predict the fundamental mode of binding for the proarrhythmic drug dofetilide with the promiscuous cardiac drug target, the hERG potassium channel. In a novel linkage between the atomistic and functional scales, computed binding affinities and rates from atomistic simulation are utilized here to parameterize function scale kinetic models of dofetilide interactions with the hERG channel. The kinetic model components are then integrated into predictive models at the cell and tissue scales to expose fundamental arrhythmia vulnerability mechanisms and complex interactions underlying emergent behaviors. Human clinical data from published studies were used to validate model framework and showed excellent agreement, demonstrating feasibility of the approach. The model predictions show that a clinically relevant dose of dofetilide increased arrhythmia vulnerability in all emergent TRIaD-linked parameters including Triangulation, Reverse use-dependence, beat-to-beat Instability and temporal and spatial action potential duration Dispersion. Application of machine learning demonstrated redundancy in the TRIaD linked parameters and suggested that changes in beat-to-beat instability were highly predictive of arrhythmia vulnerability in this setting. Here, we demonstrate the development and validation of a prototype multiscale model framework to predict electro-toxicity in the heart for the proarrhythmic drug dofetilide from the atom to the rhythm. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Cardiotoxicity in the form of deadly abnormal rhythms is one of the most common and dangerous risks for drugs in development and clinical use. There is an urgent need for new approaches to screen and predict the effects of chemically similar drugs on the cardiac rhythm and to move beyond the QT interval as a diagnostic indicator for arrhythmia. To this end, we present a computational pipeline to predict cardiotoxicity over multiple temporal and spatial scales from the drug chemistry to the cardiac rhythm. We utilize predicted quantitative estimates of ion channel-drug interactions from our companion paper to simulate cardiotoxicity over multiple temporal and spatial scales from the drug chemistry to the cardiac rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2019) studied Drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Dofetilide vs. Drug-free control was evaluated on Arrhythmia vulnerability parameters (TRIaD). A multiscale computational model predicted that a clinically relevant dose of dofetilide increased arrhythmia vulnerability across all emergent TRIaD-linked parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: