Key result
The role of glucose variability in the development of diabetes complications remains an unanswered question requiring further specifically designed studies.
Why the study?
Does glucose variability increase the risk of micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with diabetes?
The contribution of glucose variability to diabetes complication risk remains a major unanswered question that requires specifically designed clinical trials to resolve.
There is still a debate as to whether or not glucose variability contributes to diabetes complication risk. There is much in vitro laboratory evidence that glycaemic instability gives rise to increased production of reactive oxygen species and has a detrimental effect on endothelial dysfunction. While some in vivo studies have also shown similar findings in patients with or without diabetes, others have been unable to confirm any association. Furthermore, clinical studies which have sought to translate this possible risk into an increased likelihood of developing micro- or macrovascular complications have so far not demonstrated an effect. However, few of these trials were specifically designed to establish any influence of glucose fluctuations. This issue is now one of the largest remaining unanswered questions in diabetes. While this article focuses on the data which do not support a role for glucose variability in the development of complications, it also highlights the need for further studies to be performed which will definitively resolve the matter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kilpatrick et al. (2010) conducted a review in Diabetes. Glucose variability was evaluated. The role of glucose variability in the development of diabetes complications remains an unanswered question requiring further specifically designed studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: