Key result
Standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty improved the mean-adjusted Constant Score from 30.0 to 95.0 points at a mean follow-up of 10 years.
Why the study?
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcome data after standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty remain underreported.
Does standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty improve clinical outcomes in patients over 60 years of age with cuff tear arthropathy or osteoarthritis?
Cohort (n=27)
Does standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty improve clinical outcomes in patients over 60 years of age with cuff tear arthropathy or osteoarthritis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports medium-term gains in elevation, abduction, and pain with cemented long-stem RSA; leaves open durability and notching risks.
Background: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcome data after standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remain underreported. The aim of this study is to report on medium- to long-term data of patients over 60 years of age. Methods: The same type of RSA (Aequalis Reverse II, Memphis, TN, USA) was implanted in 27 patients with a mean age of 73 years (range 61−84). Indications for RSA were cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) in 25 cases and osteoarthritis (OA) in two cases. Pre- and postoperative Constant Score was assessed and component loosening, polyethylene wear, scapular notching and revision rates were recorded at a mean clinical follow-up (FU) of 127.6 months (SD ± 33.7; range 83−185). Results: The mean-adjusted CS (aCS) improved from 30.0 (range 10−59) to 95.0 (range 33−141) points (p < 0.001). Glenoid loosening was found in two (9.1%) and stem loosening was found in three (13.6%) cases. Polyethylene wear was observed in four (18.2%) cases. Scapular notching appeared in 15 (68.2%) cases but was not associated with poor aCS (p = 0.423), high levels of pain (p = 0.798) or external rotation (p = 0.229). Revision surgery was necessary in three (11.1%) cases. Conclusions: RSA with a cemented standard long stem leads to improvement in forward elevation, abduction and pain after a mean FU of 10 years. However, external rotation does not improve with this prosthetic design. Moreover, scapular notching is observed in the majority of cases, and revision rates (11.1%) as well as humeral loosening rates (13.6%) remain a concern. Level of evidence: Level 4, retrospective cohort study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bülhoff et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cuff tear arthropathy or osteoarthritis (n=27). Standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was evaluated on Mean-adjusted Constant Score (aCS) (p=<0.001). Standard cemented long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty improved the mean-adjusted Constant Score from 30.0 to 95.0 points at a mean follow-up of 10 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: