Key result
L-propionylcarnitine pretreatment attenuated no-reflow, returning myocardial blood flow to 82% of baseline compared to 61% with saline, but did not affect recovery of energy charge.
Why the study?
Does L-propionylcarnitine pretreatment improve postischemic blood flow and energy recovery in a porcine model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Does L-propionylcarnitine pretreatment improve postischemic blood flow and energy recovery in a porcine model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 82% vs 61%
In a porcine ischemia-reperfusion model, L-propionylcarnitine pretreatment attenuates the no-reflow phenomenon and preserves cardiac output but does not improve myocardial stunning or energy charge recovery.
May enhance postischemic perfusion in experimental ischemia; leaves open translation to clinical cardioprotection.
Effects of pretreatment with L-propionylcarnitine (50 mg/kg, n = 9) or saline (n = 10) were studied in open-chest anesthetized pigs, in which ischemia was induced by decreasing left anterior descending coronary artery blood flow to 20% of baseline. After 60 min of ischemia, myocardium was reperfused for 2 h. In both groups, flow reduction abolished contractile function of the affected myocardium and caused similar decreases in ATP (by 55%) and energy charge [(ATP + 0.5ADP)/(ATP + ADP + AMP); decrease from 0.91 to 0.60], mean arterial blood pressure (by 10-24%), the maximum rate of rise in left ventricular pressure (by 26-32%), and cardiac output (by 20-30%). During reperfusion, "no-reflow" was attenuated by L-propionylcarnitine, because myocardial blood flow returned to 61 and 82% of baseline in the saline- and L-propionylcarnitine-treated animals, respectively. Cardiac output of the saline-treated animals further decreased (to 52% of baseline), and systemic vascular resistance increased from 46 +/- 3 to 61 +/- 9 mmHg.min.l-1, thereby maintaining arterial blood pressure. In L-propionylcarnitine-treated pigs, cardiac output remained at 75% of baseline, and systemic vascular resistance decreased from 42 +/- 3 to 38 +/- 4 mmHg.min.l-1. In both groups, energy charge but not the ATP level of the ischemic-reperfused myocardium tended to recover, whereas the creatine phosphate level showed significantly more recovery in saline-treated animals. We conclude that L-propionylcarnitine partially preserved vascular patency in ischemic-reperfused porcine myocardium but had no immediate effect on "myocardial stunning." Potential markers for long-term recovery were not affected by L-propionylcarnitine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sassen et al. (1991) studied Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (n=19). L-propionylcarnitine vs. Saline was evaluated on Myocardial blood flow during reperfusion (% of baseline). L-propionylcarnitine pretreatment attenuated no-reflow, returning myocardial blood flow to 82% of baseline compared to 61% with saline, but did not affect recovery of energy charge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: