Key result
Aspirin use did not significantly reduce the rate of embolic events compared to no antiplatelet therapy early after bioprosthesis replacement (5.2% vs 1.7%; HR 3.18; 95% CI 0.5-19.6; P=0.33).
Why the study?
Does isolated aspirin use reduce the rate of embolic events in rheumatic patients early after bioprosthesis replacement?
Cohort (n=184)
Does isolated aspirin use reduce the rate of embolic events in rheumatic patients early after bioprosthesis replacement?
Hazard Ratio: 3.18 (95% CI 0.5–19.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.2% vs 1.7%
p-value: p=0.33
Aspirin use did not significantly reduce the rate of thromboembolism in the first 90 days after bioprosthesis replacement in rheumatic patients.
Early aspirin was not linked to fewer embolic events after bioprosthetic replacement; leaves open optimal antithrombotic strategy pending randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: There is still much debate regarding the kind of antithrombotic therapy in the immediate postoperative period of bioprosthesis replacement (first three months). Thus, the authors consider relevant to determine the contemporary incidence of thromboembolic events in rheumatic patients early after implantation of aortic and mitral bioprosthesis replacement (first 90 days in the post-operative period) and perform a comparison between isolated Aspirin uses versus no-antiplatelet therapy, in this same context. METHODS: Between the period of January 2010 to July 2012, all consecutive rheumatic patients, with basal sinus rhythm, who performed mitral and aortic valve replacement with bioprosthesis (pericardial bovine), were included in this prospective cohort study, 184 patients in total. The primary endpoint evaluated were the rate of embolic events. RESULTS: In the first 30 days, there were three cerebral ischemic events among patients treated in Aspirin group (5.2%) compared with two events in patients without Aspirin therapy (1.7%), HR = 3.18; 95% CI 0.5 to 19.6; P=0.33. Between 31 and 90 days postoperatively, no patient had a primary outcome. The embolism-free survival, bleeding events and the overall survival were not statistically significant between the aspirin and no-antiplatelet groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in this prospective cohort of rheumatic patients, we found a low and very rare incidence rate of embolic events during the first 90 days postoperative period in mitral and isolated aortic position, respectively. The use of aspirin did not significantly reduce the rate of thromboembolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durães et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Rheumatic disease requiring bioprosthesis replacement (n=184). Aspirin vs. No antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Rate of embolic events (HR 3.18, 95% CI 0.5 to 19.6, p=0.33). Aspirin use did not significantly reduce the rate of embolic events compared to no antiplatelet therapy early after bioprosthesis replacement (5.2% vs 1.7%; HR 3.18; 95% CI 0.5-19.6; P=0.33).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: