Key result
Learning style shows no association with cognitive impairment in patients with acquired brain injury.
Observational (n=92)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The way a patient prefers to approach or choose a learning situation represents the patient's learning style. The objective of this chart review study was to explore the relation between learning style and cognitive impairment in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). We used data from files of 92 adult patients with ABI referred to inpatient rehabilitation, who completed the Adapted Learning Style Inventory (A-LSI) and at least one of the following neuropsychological tests: Trail Making Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, WAIS-III Digit Span, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test-Copy, Stroop Color-Word Test, or the Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test. The A-LSI yielded the following distribution of learning styles: 4 doers, 48 observers, 2 deciders and 38 thinkers. No significant correlation coefficients were found between the neuropsychological tests and the A-LSI. Furthermore, Chi-square tests revealed no significant associations between learning style (observer, thinker) and cognitive impairment. The results of this exploratory study suggest that learning style and cognitive impairment are independent in patients with ABI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boosman et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Acquired brain injury (ABI) (n=92). Learning style vs. Different learning styles (doers, observers, deciders, thinkers) was evaluated on Correlation between learning style and cognitive impairment on neuropsychological tests. Learning style showed no significant association with cognitive impairment across multiple neuropsychological tests in 92 adult patients with acquired brain injury.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: