Key result
A weight-based protocol for peri-procedural unfractionated heparin increased the proportion of therapeutic ACT on first draw from 58% to 77% (p=0.010) in patients on pre-procedure DOACs.
Why the study?
A weight-based heparin dosing protocol adjusted for pre-procedural oral anticoagulation was implemented to reduce sub-therapeutic dosing during left atrial catheter ablation.
Does a weight-based, pre-procedure anticoagulation-adjusted heparin protocol improve the prevalence of therapeutic ACT and decrease time to therapeutic ACT in patients undergoing left atrial ablation?
Observational (n=200)
Does a weight-based, pre-procedure anticoagulation-adjusted heparin protocol improve the prevalence of therapeutic ACT and decrease time to therapeutic ACT in patients undergoing left atrial ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 77% vs 58%
p-value: p=0.010
A weight-based heparin protocol adjusted for pre-procedural anticoagulation improves the achievement of therapeutic ACT in patients on DOACs undergoing left atrial ablation.
May support weight-based heparin dosing for DOAC patients in left atrial ablation; leaves open impact on clinical outcomes in randomized trials.
Introduction: A weight-based heparin dosing policy that adjusted for pre-procedural oral anticoagulation was implemented to reduce the likelihood of sub-therapeutic dosing during left atrial catheter ablation procedures. Our hypothesis was that initiation of the protocol would result in a greater prevalence of therapeutic Activated Clotting Time (ACT) values and decreased time to therapeutic ACT during left atrial ablation procedures. Methods: A departmental protocol was initiated for which subjects received intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) to achieve and maintain a goal of ACT >300 seconds. Initial bolus dose was adjusted for pre-procedure oral anticoagulation and weight as follows: 50 units/kg for those receiving warfarin, 75 units/kg for those not anticoagulated, and 120 units/kg for those on direct oral anticoagulants. An UFH infusion was initiated at 10% of the bolus per hour. An observational study was performed on 100 consecutive left atrial ablation procedures with usual care, versus 100 with protocol guided peri-procedural care. Results: When usual care and protocol guided cohorts were compared, significant findings were limited to those on pre-procedure direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The initial UFH bolus increased from 97±29 units/Kg to 113±29 units/Kg (p<0.001), the proportion of therapeutic ACT on first draw after heparin administration increased from 58% to 77% (p=0.010), and the time to therapeutic ACT after UFH administration decreased from 37.8±19.8 minutes to 30.2±16.4 minutes (p=0.032). Conclusion: A weight-based protocol for peri-procedural UFH administration resulted in a higher proportion of therapeutic ACT values and decreased the time to therapeutic ACT for those on pre-procedure DOAC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradley et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Left atrial catheter ablation (n=200). Protocol-guided peri-procedural anticoagulation vs. Usual care was evaluated on Proportion of therapeutic ACT on first draw after heparin administration (in DOAC subgroup) (p=0.010). A weight-based protocol for peri-procedural unfractionated heparin increased the proportion of therapeutic ACT on first draw from 58% to 77% (p=0.010) in patients on pre-procedure DOACs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: