Key result
For coexistent severe carotid and coronary artery disease, 1-stage CAS-CABG has a reported major adverse event rate of 1.4-4.5%, compared to 10-12% for traditional CEA-CABG.
Why the study?
What are the outcomes of different revascularization strategies (CAS-CABG vs CEA-CABG) in patients with severe symptomatic carotid and coronary artery disease?
What are the outcomes of different revascularization strategies (CAS-CABG vs CEA-CABG) in patients with severe symptomatic carotid and coronary artery disease?
Hybrid revascularization (CAS-CABG) is emerging as a viable therapeutic option for concomitant severe carotid and coronary artery disease, potentially offering lower MAE rates than traditional CEA-CABG, though randomized trials are needed.
Coexistent carotid artery stenosis (CS) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is not infrequent. One in 5 patients with multivessel CAD has a severe CS, and CAD incidence reaches 80% in those referred for carotid revascularization. We reviewed treatment strategies for concomitant severe CS and CAD. We performed a literature search (MEDLINE) with terms including carotid artery stenting (CAS), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), carotid endarterectomy (CEA), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). The main therapeutic option for CS-CAD has been (simultaneous or staged) CEA-CABG. This, however, is associated with a high risk of MI (in those with CEA prior to CABG) or stroke (CABG prior to CEA), and the cumulative major adverse event rate (MAE - death, stroke or MI) reaches 10-12%. With increasing adoption of CAS, a sequential strategy of CAS followed by CABG has emerged. Registries (usually single-centre) indicate an MAE rate of ≈7% for CAS followed by CABG (frequently after >30 days, due to double antiplatelet therapy). Recently, 1-stage CAS-CABG has been introduced. This involves different antiplatelet regimens and, in some centers, preferred off-pump CABG, with a cumulative MAE of 1.4-4.5%. No randomized trial comparing different treatment strategies in CS-CAD has been conducted, and thus far reported series are prone to selection/reporting bias. In addition to the established surgical treatment (CEA-CABG, sequential/simultaneous), hybrid revascularization (CAS-CABG) is emerging as a viable therapeutic option. Larger, preferably multi-centre, studies are required before this can become widely applied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dzierwa et al. (2011) conducted a review in Coexistent severe carotid artery stenosis and multivessel coronary artery disease. Carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting (CAS-CABG) vs. Carotid endarterectomy and CABG (CEA-CABG) was evaluated on Cumulative major adverse event rate (death, stroke, or MI). For coexistent severe carotid and coronary artery disease, 1-stage CAS-CABG has a reported major adverse event rate of 1.4-4.5%, compared to 10-12% for traditional CEA-CABG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: