Key result
Posterior left pericardiotomy during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery significantly reduced the odds of postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.55-0.95; P=0.023).
Why the study?
Studies have shown a promising reduction in postoperative AF with posterior pericardiotomy, but data on its widespread use among cardiac surgeons are limited.
Does posterior left pericardiotomy reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?
Cohort (n=2,480)
No
Does posterior left pericardiotomy reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?
Odds Ratio: 0.73 (95% CI 0.55–0.95)
p-value: p=0.023
In a real-world retrospective analysis, posterior left pericardiotomy during CABG surgery significantly reduced the incidence and cumulative duration of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
PP adoption may reduce POAF after CABG; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before routine practice change.
Objective Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common postoperative complication with an incidence of up to 10% to 33% after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and is associated with worse morbidity and mortality. At present, studies have shown a promising reduction in postoperative AF (POAF) with posterior pericardiotomy (PP). However, there are limited data on the widespread use of PP amongst cardiac surgeons. This retrospective analysis assesses the influence of a real-world adoption of PP on the incidence and cumulative burden of POAF. Methods Patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. One group had PP as part of their surgical procedure whilst the control group did not. For both groups, the incidence of POAF was analyzed. PP was performed via a 5-cm incision between the left inferior pulmonary vein and the phrenic nerve. Results Two thousand four hundred eighty patients were included in the analysis; 806 patients underwent PP and 1674 formed the control group. PP was associated with a 27.4% reduction in the odds of developing POAF (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .023). Age was significantly associated with POAF, with a 4.3% increase in odds per additional year (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06; P < .001). In the multivariate model for AF, PP remained significantly protective, reducing the odds of POAF by 26.9% (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.96; P = .028). Patients who underwent PP had significantly reduced cumulative POAF duration, with a 5.3% average reduction ( P = .002). Conclusions Posterior left pericardiotomy is associated with reduced odds and duration of POAF. A large, multicenter trial is indicated to confirm this finding as well as the influence of PP and POAF on postdischarge clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahdev et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (n=2,480). Posterior left pericardiotomy vs. No posterior pericardiotomy was evaluated on Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.95, p=0.023). Posterior left pericardiotomy during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery significantly reduced the odds of postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.55-0.95; P=0.023).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: