Key result
Topical antibiotic prophylaxis after closure did not show significant benefit in preventing surgical site infection following cardiac device implantation.
Why the study?
Does topical antibiotic prophylaxis prevent surgical site infection in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation?
RCT (n=1,008)
Placebo-controlled
Randomized into four groups
No
Does topical antibiotic prophylaxis prevent surgical site infection in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation?
Topical antibiotic prophylaxis after closure does not significantly reduce surgical site infections in cardiac device implantation compared to standard systemic antibiotics alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Targeted prevention beyond standard prophylaxis is needed in cardiac device procedures; extends RCT evidence on procedural duration as an infection risk factor.
BACKGROUND: Combined systemic and topical antibiotic prophylaxes are used in cardiac electronic implantable device (CEID) procedures, but very few studies have assessed prophylactic use of topical antibiotics after CEID implantation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of surgical site infection after CEID implantation procedures. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center, single-operator study. All patients (n = 1,008) received standard systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients were randomized into four groups and received various topical prophylaxes after procedure. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. Surgical site inflammation and infection were graded based on degree of inflammation, discharge, wound culture, and blood culture. RESULT: Fifty-eight patients developed surgical site inflammation and infection. Fourteen patients had culture-positive wound infections. Among them, 13 patients had superficial wound infections with Staphylococcus species. Only one had pocket infection with Pseudomonas bacteremia. The surgical site infection rate was higher in those with longer procedural time, associated with 2.3 times more likelihood of infection (P = 0.01). Patients with an associated malignancy were associated with 3.6 times more likelihood of infection (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Careful skin preparation prior to incision is important, whereas the use of topical antibiotics after closure has not shown significant benefit. Patients with malignancy and longer procedural times are more likely to develop infection. There is a trend for less infection with cephalic approach. Systemic antibiotics with staphylococcal coverage are needed as most of the wound culture positive infections are caused by Staphylococcus species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalighi et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Cardiac electronic implantable device (CEID) implantation (n=1,008). Topical antibiotic prophylaxis vs. Placebo was evaluated on Surgical site inflammation and infection. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis after closure did not show significant benefit in preventing surgical site infection following cardiac device implantation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: