Key result
The currently used clinical case definition of acute flaccid paralysis increases sensitivity for detecting the syndrome but decreases specificity for detecting paralytic poliomyelitis.
The review highlights the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the clinical case definition of Acute Flaccid Paralysis for poliomyelitis surveillance.
May compromise polio surveillance specificity; leaves open refined AFP definitions balancing sensitivity and specificity.
Acute (AFP) is a clinical syndrome characterized by rapid onset of weakness, including (less frequently) weakness of the muscles of respiration and swallowing, progressing to maximum severity within several days to weeks. The term flaccid indicates the absence of spasticity or other signs of disordered central nervous system motor tracts such as hyperreflexia, clonus, or extensor plantar responses (1). When applied to voluntary muscles, paralysis means loss of contraction due to interruption of motor pathways from the cortex to the muscle fiber. It is preferable to use the term paresis for slight loss of motor strength and paralysis or plegia for severe loss of motor strength (1). The differential diagnosis of AFP varies considerably with age. No single operational clinical case definition of AFP or paralytic poliomyelitis that combines both high sensitivity and high specificity has emerged (2-4). The currently used case definition increases sensitivity in detecting the existence of AFP but tends to decrease specificity in detecting paralytic poliomyelitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marx et al. (2000) conducted a review in Acute Flaccid Paralysis. The currently used clinical case definition of acute flaccid paralysis increases sensitivity for detecting the syndrome but decreases specificity for detecting paralytic poliomyelitis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: