Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 30, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology

2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

FKFrederick G. KushnerInterventional CardiologyMHMary M. HandGeneral / Preventive / Lipids
Sidney C. Smith
Sidney C. SmithGeneral / Preventive / Lipids

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Key expert perspectives

Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.

WFWilliam F. FearonInterventional cardiologist, Stanford University Medical Center

“Use of FFR technology represents a rare opportunity in medicine in which an innovative product not only improves clinical outcomes but also saves money.”

News Coverage
JHJohn HodgsonChairman of Cardiology, Geisinger Health System

“The FAME study provides very compelling evidence that angiographic imaging alone should not be used to triage intermediate lesions. The simple fact that similar-appearing angiographic stenoses can be significant 39% of the time and insignificant 61% of the time (in terms of causing or not causing ischemia) highlights the limitations of the angiogram in making these important clinical and economic decisions. How can you rely only on an angiogram to make a decision to stent or not-stent if the data suggest that you will be wrong either 39% of the time or 61% of the time?”

News Coverage
SHScott HuennekensPresident and CEO, Volcano Corporation

“Volcano commends the AHA, ACC and SCAI for responding so quickly to new data, like the FAME study, to revise their guidelines on how to best treat patients with severe coronary artery disease. Many medical guidelines are being reviewed and many patients are being told less screening is better. Most recently, scans similar to angiography have been projected to increase the risk of cancer, when done excessively or unnecessarily, as they expose the patient to increased radiation. These new recommendations highlight the benefit of using highly localized therapy guidance technology like FFR to go beyond the limits of angiography and more precisely pinpoint the severity of coronary disease on a lesion-by-lesion basis.”

News Coverage

Cite This Study

Kushner et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6ac2a158564c890bc0c3a8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.015
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Results and Long-Term Predictors of Adverse Clinical Events After Elective Percutaneous Interventions on Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery2002 · 221 citations
  2. 2Early and Sustained Dual Oral Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention2002 · 3,090 citations
  3. 3A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel2009 · 767 citations
  4. 4ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations2000 · 4,505 citations
  5. 5Intensive Insulin Therapy in the Medical ICU2006 · 3,680 citations