Key result
Patients with persistent macroalbuminuria or severe proteinuria 6 months after esaxerenone initiation had a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular and renal events compared to those with normal albuminuria (12.4 vs 0.8 per 100 person-years, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Although UACR and UPCR predict cardiovascular and renal events, the impact of changes in proteinuria severity on prognosis after starting esaxerenone in hypertensive patients remained to be evaluated.
Does improvement in proteinuria severity following esaxerenone initiation improve cardiovascular and renal prognosis in hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=164)
No
Does improvement in proteinuria severity following esaxerenone initiation improve cardiovascular and renal prognosis in hypertensive patients?
In hypertensive patients treated with esaxerenone, improvement in proteinuria severity at 6 months is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular and renal events, achieving a prognosis similar to patients with normal proteinuria.
Proteinuria changes after esaxerenone may refine prognosis in hypertensives; leaves open whether monitoring improves outcomes.
Background: The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) or urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) has been reported as predictors of cardiovascular and renal events. We aimed to evaluate the impact of changes in proteinuria severity on the prognosis of hypertensive patients post-esaxerenone initiation. Methods and Results: Hypertensive patients who commenced esaxerenone (n=164) were classified into 3 groups according to baseline UACR or UPCR, based on the modified proteinuria severity classification: A1 (normal; n=35); A2 (microalbuminuria/mild proteinuria; n=49); and A3 (macroalbuminuria/severe proteinuria; n=80). At 6 months post-esaxerenone initiation, these patients were then reclassified into 3 groups: Á1 (n=48); Á2 (n=66); and Á3 (n=50). Á2 was further subdivided into 2 groups: Á2a (n=34); and Á2b (n=32), the latter representing patients who improved from A3. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of cardiovascular and renal death, heart failure hospitalization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, initiation of dialysis, and estimated glomerular filtration rate decline exceeding 40%. Severity of proteinuria improved significantly after 6 months (P=0.003). The incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in Á3 compared with Á1 (log-rank P<0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between Á1 and Á2b (log-rank P=0.12). Conclusions: Esaxerenone may ameliorate proteinuria severity and improve the prognosis of patients with macroalbuminuria or severe proteinuria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitao et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=164). Macroalbuminuria or severe proteinuria at 6 months post-esaxerenone (Group Á3) vs. Normal albuminuria or proteinuria at 6 months post-esaxerenone (Group Á1) was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular and renal death, heart failure hospitalization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, initiation of dialysis, and eGFR decline >40% (p=<0.001). Patients with persistent macroalbuminuria or severe proteinuria 6 months after esaxerenone initiation had a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular and renal events compared to those with normal albuminuria (12.4 vs 0.8 per 100 person-years, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: