Key result
Esaxerenone add-on therapy reduces UACR ~29% compared to ARB dose escalation.
Why the study?
Residual albuminuria remains a challenge in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension despite RAS inhibitors, and the effects of esaxerenone on oxidative stress remain unclear.
Does esaxerenone add-on therapy reduce albuminuria and oxidative stress in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and albuminuria compared to angiotensin II receptor blocker dose escalation?
RCT (n=50)
Open-label
Block randomization
Yes
Does esaxerenone add-on therapy reduce albuminuria and oxidative stress in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and albuminuria compared to angiotensin II receptor blocker dose escalation?
In hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria, adding esaxerenone to standard-dose ARB therapy reduces albuminuria and blood pressure more effectively than escalating the ARB dose.
Esaxerenone add-on may be preferred over ARB escalation for albuminuria reduction in T2DM hypertension; extends direct RCT evidence for nonsteroidal MRAs.
Aims Residual albuminuria remains a major clinical challenge in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension despite renin–angiotensin system inhibitor therapy. Esaxerenone, a selective nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, reduces albuminuria; however, its effects on oxidative stress remain unclear. Materials and Methods This 24‐week, prospective, randomized, open‐label, multicenter exploratory trial was conducted in Japan. Hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and albuminuria receiving standard‐dose angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy were randomized to angiotensin II receptor blocker dose escalation or esaxerenone add‐on therapy. Of 50 randomized patients, 47 were included in the full analysis set and 39 in the final analysis population (20 in the angiotensin II receptor blocker dose‐escalation group and 19 in the esaxerenone add‐on group). The primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 24 in urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio and oxidative stress assessed by diacron‐reactive oxygen metabolites. Results Esaxerenone add‐on therapy produced a significantly greater reduction in log‐transformed urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio than angiotensin II receptor blocker dose‐escalation therapy, with an adjusted between‐group ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.87; p = 0.002). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower with esaxerenone. Estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased more with esaxerenone, whereas serum potassium levels did not differ significantly between groups. No significant between‐group difference was observed in diacron‐reactive oxygen metabolites. Conclusions In hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and albuminuria, esaxerenone add‐on therapy reduced albuminuria and blood pressure more effectively than angiotensin II receptor blocker dose escalation but did not significantly reduce oxidative stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohara et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and albuminuria (n=50). Esaxerenone add-on therapy vs. Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) dose escalation was evaluated on Change from baseline to Week 24 in log-transformed urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) (adjusted between-group ratio of 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.87, p=0.002). Esaxerenone add-on therapy significantly reduced log-transformed urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio compared to ARB dose-escalation therapy, with an adjusted between-group ratio of 0.71.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: