Key result
Esaxerenone linked to a 20 mmHg SBP drop and improved metabolic parameters versus amlodipine in diabetes.
Why the study?
Esaxerenone may effectively treat diabetes-associated mineralocorticoid receptor-related hypertension, but few studies have evaluated its use in clinical practice.
Does esaxerenone improve blood pressure and metabolic parameters in hypertensive subjects with diabetes compared to amlodipine?
Observational (n=104)
Yes
Does esaxerenone improve blood pressure and metabolic parameters in hypertensive subjects with diabetes compared to amlodipine?
Absolute Event Rate: -20% vs -13%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a real-world setting, esaxerenone provided greater reductions in systolic blood pressure, albuminuria, and liver enzymes compared to amlodipine in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes.
Esaxerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, may be an effective treatment for diabetes-associated mineralocorticoid receptor-related hypertension, but there have been few studies of its use in clinical practice. We aimed to determine the effects of esaxerenone on blood pressure (BP) and metabolic parameters of hypertensive subjects with diabetes in a clinical practice setting. We performed a retrospective multicenter observational study of hypertensive subjects with type 2 diabetes/prediabetes. We first compared the values of parameters at baseline and after 6 months of esaxerenone administration, then compared the changes in the parameters in propensity score-matched subjects who initiated esaxerenone or amlodipine administration. Correlation analysis was performed to identify factors associated with these changes. The single-arm analysis showed that esaxerenone caused significant reductions in systolic and diastolic BP from 155.2 ± 17.7 and 83.3 ± 12.3 mmHg at baseline to 132.9 ± 15.5 and 72.3 ± 12.9 mmHg, respectively, after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.01). In addition, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The esaxerenone group showed significantly larger reductions in systolic BP, AST, ALT, and UACR than the amlodipine group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between the change in ALT and baseline BMI (p < 0.05). Esaxerenone has an antihypertensive effect, reduces the albuminuria, and reduces the activities of liver enzymes in hypertensive subjects with type 2 diabetes/prediabetes. The present findings suggest that esaxerenone has pleiotropic effects in such subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuwabara et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hypertension with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes (n=104). Esaxerenone vs. Amlodipine was evaluated on Change in systolic blood pressure (ΔSBP) (p=<0.05). Esaxerenone significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (median change -20 mmHg vs -13 mmHg, p<0.05) and improved metabolic parameters compared to amlodipine in hypertensive patients with diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: