Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Predicting the responses of forest growth to elevated temperature (T) and atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) on decadal time scales presents a formidable challenge because of the many interacting processes involved. A key uncertainty concerns the relative importance of plant and soil processes to the overall long-term response. In this study, the plant-soil model GDAY was used to simulate forest growth responses to T and [CO2] on different time scales for forests in cool and warm climates. An equilibrium-based graphical analysis was used to distinguish the roles played by plant and soil processes in determining the response. Doubled [CO2] caused a large initial increase (20%) in net primary productivity (NPP), but this did not persist in the long term. By contrast, a 2 degrees C increase in T caused a persistent long-term increase in NPP of approximately 10-15%. These responses were similar at cool and warm sites. The equilibrium analysis indicated that soil processes dominated the long-term responses predicted by the model. In particular, the predicted long-term increase in NPP under elevated T reflected an increase in predicted N mineralization and plant N uptake, assuming that a constant fraction of mineralized N is taken up by plants. The analysis highlights key uncertainties for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medlyn et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: