Key result
Switching from warfarin to rivaroxaban significantly improved ACTS Burdens scores at 3 months (54.6 vs baseline 51.0, p<0.001) in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does switching from warfarin to rivaroxaban improve patient-reported treatment satisfaction in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational
Yes
Does switching from warfarin to rivaroxaban improve patient-reported treatment satisfaction in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 54.6% vs 51%
p-value: p=< .001
Switching from warfarin to rivaroxaban significantly improves patient-reported treatment satisfaction in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
May improve satisfaction after warfarin-to-rivaroxaban switch in Japanese NVAF; leaves open effects on adherence or outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Rivaroxaban has previously been shown to be as efficacious and safe as warfarin for the prevention of stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Therefore, treatment satisfaction becomes an important consideration. Here we examine treatment satisfaction in Japanese NVAF patients who were switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban. METHODS: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected as part of a prospective, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of a direct oral-anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, in Japan. The Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II (TSQM-II) were collected at baseline, month 3, and month 6. Change in scores from baseline to month 3 and month 6 were assessed. Exploratory analyses included change in scores by patient characteristics. Safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban were also assessed. RESULTS: ACTS Burdens scores significantly improved at month 3 (54.6 ± 6.3) and month 6 (54.5 ± 6.5) compared to baseline (51.0 ± 7.6) (p < .001). ACTS Benefits score remained stable over time (baseline = 10.1 ± 2.8, month 3 = 10.2 ± 3.1, month 6 = 10.1 ± 3.1). Mean TSQM-II sub-scale scores significantly improved at month 3 and month 6 compared to baseline for all four domains (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest treatment satisfaction may improve in Japanese NVAF patients after a switch from warfarin to rivaroxaban. Higher treatment satisfaction may translate into improved treatment adherence, which is critical for the long-term prevention of stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koretsune et al. (2018) conducted an observational in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin (baseline) was evaluated on ACTS Burdens score at month 3 (p=< .001). Switching from warfarin to rivaroxaban significantly improved ACTS Burdens scores at 3 months (54.6 vs baseline 51.0, p<0.001) in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: