Key result
NOACs were superior to warfarin for the composite of thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.77; P<0.001 for superiority).
Why the study?
Real-world long-term data comparing the efficacy and safety of NOACs to warfarin in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation are lacking.
Do NOACs reduce the composite of thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=19,994)
Yes
Do NOACs reduce the composite of thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.7 (95% CI 0.63–0.77)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.5% vs 6%
p-value: p=<0.001 for superiority
In Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, NOACs are associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin in real-world practice.
NOACs were associated with lower composite events than warfarin in Asian AF; extends real-world data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Backgrounds Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Real world long-term data on the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared to warfarin in Asians are lacking. Purpose We aimed to explore the effectiveness and safety of NOAC in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods The medical records were reviewed in registry of four tertiary referral hospitals between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the composite of thromboembolism, major bleeding and all caused mortality. Results Data were analyzed for 19,994 participants with oral anticoagulant and atrial fibrillation (median age, 72 years; female, 41.5%; warfarin, 35.5%; median CHA2DS2-VASc score, 3). The rate of the primary outcome was 5.5% per year in the NOAC group, as compared with 6.0% per year in the warfarin group (HR with NOAC, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.77; P<0.001 for superiority). The rate of ischemic event was 2.2% per year in the NOAC group, as compared with 2.8% per year in the warfarin group (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.65; P<0.001). The rate of major bleeding was 1.9% per year in the NOAC group, as compared with 2.2% per year in the warfarin group (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001), and the rates of all caused death were 1.9% and 3.2%, respectively (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.02; P=0.08). conclusion In Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, NOAC was effective and safe to prevent thromboembolic events with less bleeding compared to warfarin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roh et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in atrial fibrillation (n=19,994). NOACs vs. warfarin was evaluated on composite of thromboembolism, major bleeding and all caused mortality (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.77, p=<0.001 for superiority). NOACs were superior to warfarin for the composite of thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.77; P<0.001 for superiority).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: