Key result
Zoom imaging significantly reduced aortic MRI time compared to conventional imaging (15 vs 41 minutes, P<0.01) while maintaining excellent image quality and vessel wall thickness agreement.
Why the study?
Does zoom imaging reduce scan time while maintaining image quality compared to conventional full field-of-view MRI for aortic vessel wall imaging in healthy volunteers?
Cross-Sectional (n=15)
Does zoom imaging reduce scan time while maintaining image quality compared to conventional full field-of-view MRI for aortic vessel wall imaging in healthy volunteers?
Zoom imaging significantly reduces MRI scan time for aortic vessel wall assessment without compromising image quality or thickness measurements compared to conventional imaging.
Zoom imaging may accelerate aortic MRI; extends technical feasibility but leaves open validation for atherosclerosis risk assessment.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the utility of a "reduced field-of-view" (zoom imaging) technique to accelerate free-breathing, ECG-triggered, turbo-spin-echo black-blood sequences, which have been previously described to detect subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MRI of the thoracic and abdominal aorta. Imaging with the conventional full field-of-view sequence was compared with zoom imaging. Total scan time, image quality (i.e., contrast-to-noise ratio and vessel wall sharpness) and vessel wall thickness were analyzed. A subgroup of 10 volunteers also underwent acceleration of imaging using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for comparison. RESULTS: Zoom imaging significantly reduced imaging time from a mean of 41 ± 9 min (conventional imaging) to 15 ± 0.5 min (P<0.01). There was no difference in image quality between conventional and zoom imaging with respect to CNR (10.1 ± 6 versus 10.1 ± 6) or vessel wall sharpness (38 ± 4% versus 39 ± 4%). Furthermore, Bland Altman plots showed excellent agreement in vessel wall thickness measurements using the two methods. In comparison, SENSE not only reduced CNR but also resulted in underestimation of vessel wall thickness compared with the conventional sequence. CONCLUSION: Zoom imaging allows accurate and time-efficient imaging of the abdominal and thoracic aorta for cardiovascular risk prediction. In this application, it is preferable to SENSE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=15). Zoom imaging (reduced field-of-view technique) vs. Conventional full field-of-view sequence was evaluated on Total scan time (p=<0.01). Zoom imaging significantly reduced aortic MRI time compared to conventional imaging (15 vs 41 minutes, P<0.01) while maintaining excellent image quality and vessel wall thickness agreement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: