Key result
Breath-hold non-contrast thoracic MRA provided diagnostic image quality with no significant difference in image quality or artifact scores compared to contrast-enhanced MRA (p>0.05).
Why the study?
Does breath-hold non-contrast MRA provide comparable image quality to contrast-enhanced MRA for thoracic aorta assessment?
Cross-Sectional (n=10)
Blinded readers
No
Does breath-hold non-contrast MRA provide comparable image quality to contrast-enhanced MRA for thoracic aorta assessment?
p-value: p=>0.05
Highly accelerated single breath-hold non-contrast thoracic MRA is feasible and provides diagnostic image quality comparable to contrast-enhanced MRA, offering a rapid alternative without exogenous contrast.
Supports non-contrast breath-hold thoracic MRA as contrast-free option; leaves open need for larger validation before routine adoption.
Contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) provides accurate diagnosis of aortic disease [ 1 – 4 ]. ECG-gated CE-MRA of the thoracic aorta is challenging, due to competing demands of high spatial resolution while imaging in a narrow window of the cardiac cycle within a breath-hold. In addition, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with impaired renal function is a concern with gadolinium-based contrast agents [ 5 ]. Non-contrast ECG-gated MRA (NC-MRA) is a potential alternative [ 6 ], especially for patients with poor intravenous access or contraindications to gadolinium use. Navigator-gated NC-MRA can take approximately 10 minutes [ 6 ]. We propose to perform breath-hold, ECG-gated NC-MRA (BH NC-MRA) using highly-accelerated parallel imaging with a 32-element coil array. Following informed consent, 10 subjects (7 controls, 3 patients; 6 male, mean age=35.1 ±17.0 years) were imaged on a 1.5T scanner (Siemens, Avanto) with BH NC-MRA followed by CE-MRA. Imaging parameters for BH NC-MRA using balanced steady state free precession (b-SSFP) with T2 and fat-suppression preparation pulses were: TR/TE 2.3/1.6ms, FA70°, FOV 400x400x64mm, voxel size 1.6x1.6x1.6mm , 2D GRAPPA acceleration of 3x2, segments 48, 6/8 partial Fourier in both phase encode and partition directions, partition oversampling 20%,mean scan time 19.4±4.1s. Both coil sensitivity (early systole) and MRA (mid diastole) data were acquired in the same breath hold (Figure 1 ). Pre- and post-contrast ECG-gated CE-MRA used similar parameters to achieve matched spatial resolution, TR/TE 3.6/1.1ms,,FA 17°,BW 330Hz/pixel,1D GRAPPA acceleration factor 2, mean scan time 39.4±10.5s. Gd-DTPA 0.15 mmol/kg at 2cc/sec was administered with arterial timing based on a timing bolus. Source and subtracted images (for CE-MRA) were reviewed in blinded fashion by a cardiologist and a radiologist. Image quality was scored (0-4; non-diagnostic to excellent) for 4 aortic segments (Table 1 ). Severity of artifacts was also evaluated (0-4; none to high). Single BH NC-MRA with the coil sensitivity and image data acquired at two different cardiac phases in the same cardiac cycle. Figure 2 shows representative CE-MRA and BH NC-MRA images. For the 10 subjects studied, there was no significant difference in image quality and artifact scores (p>0.05), with diagnostic quality image scores for all evaluated segments (Table 1 ). Multi planar reconstruction of A) contrast-enhanced MRA and B) noncontract enhanced MRA in a patient (59yr, Female) with aneurysm of the aortic root. This study demonstrates the feasibility of performing highly accelerated single BH NC-MRA with isotropic spatial resolution and diagnostic image quality. It has potential benefits of short scan time and repeatability without need for exogenous contrast, providing rapid, safe, entirely non-invasive assessment of the thoracic aorta
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Thoracic aortic disease (n=10). Breath-hold non-contrast ECG-gated MRA (BH NC-MRA) vs. Contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) was evaluated on Image quality and artifact scores (p=>0.05). Breath-hold non-contrast thoracic MRA provided diagnostic image quality with no significant difference in image quality or artifact scores compared to contrast-enhanced MRA (p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: