Key result
Scaffold devices for rotator cuff repair hold promise for augmenting repair sites, but require technical proficiency and further evidence to justify increased operative time and cost.
Why the study?
Do scaffold devices improve structural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair?
Do scaffold devices improve structural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair?
Scaffold devices may augment rotator cuff repair, but further evidence is needed to justify their technical challenges, increased operative time, and cost.
Failure with continuity" may underlie persistent symptoms after rotator cuff repair; leaves open whether novel techniques can improve healing.
The annual volume of rotator cuff repairs in the United States is roughly 250,000, and failure rates still range from 20% to 70% in most studies despite significant advances in surgical technique and rehabilitation protocols. Even many “healed” repairs continue to have pain, weakness, and dysfunction, a phenomenon that may be explained by “Failure with continuity,” where the healing tendon retracts from the repaired location without a structural defect, leaving interposed scar tissue. To improve clinical outcomes, there is a need to minimize the rate of structural failure and minimize the failure with continuity that occurs after rotator cuff repair. Scaffold devices, in the form of extracellular matrix or synthetic grafts, hold promise in their abilities to mechanically and/or biologically augment repair sites. However, these devices can be technically challenging to apply, and the surgeon must be proficient in their use. To justify the increased operative time and cost associated with their use, we must also demonstrate the ability of these devices to improve structural and clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amini et al. (2017) conducted a review in Rotator cuff repair. Scaffold devices (extracellular matrix or synthetic grafts) was evaluated. Scaffold devices for rotator cuff repair hold promise for augmenting repair sites, but require technical proficiency and further evidence to justify increased operative time and cost.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: