Key result
A multidisciplinary pediatric cardio-oncology clinic identified documented cardiovascular toxicities or pre-existing risk factors in 54% of referred patients, most commonly left ventricular dysfunction and hypertension.
Why the study?
Modern oncological therapies have broadened agents causing cardiac sequelae in pediatric oncology patients, prompting the opening of a multidisciplinary clinic to document cardiovascular toxicities and evaluate consensus surveillance recommendations.
Does a multidisciplinary pediatric cardio-oncology clinic identify previously unrecognized cardiovascular toxicities in pediatric oncology patients?
Observational (n=37)
No
Does a multidisciplinary pediatric cardio-oncology clinic identify previously unrecognized cardiovascular toxicities in pediatric oncology patients?
Pediatric cardio-oncology clinics are beneficial for identifying previously unrecognized cardiotoxicity, such as left ventricular dysfunction and hypertension, and addressing lifestyle risk factors.
Supports multidisciplinary pediatric cardio-oncology clinics; leaves open prospective trials to define referral criteria and outcomes.
Background: Modern oncological therapies together with chemotherapy and radiotherapy have broadened the agents that can cause cardiac sequelae, which can manifest for pediatric oncology patients while on active treatment. Recommendations for high-risk patients who should be monitored in a pediatric cardio-oncology clinic have previously been developed by expert Delphi consensus by our group. In 2022 we opened our first multidisciplinary pediatric cardio-oncology clinic adhering to these recommendations in surveillance and management. Objectives: Our pediatric cardio-oncology clinic aimed to: (i) Document cardiovascular toxicities observed within a pediatric cardio-oncology clinic and (ii) Evaluate the applicability of the Australian and New Zealand Pediatric Cardio-Oncology recommendations. Methods: Monthly multidisciplinary cardio-oncology clinics were conducted in an Australian tertiary pediatric hospital. Structured standardised approaches to assessment were built into the electronic medical record (EMR). All patients underwent baseline echocardiogram and electrocardiogram assessment together with vital signs in conjunction with standard history and examination. Results: Nineteen (54%) individuals had a documented cardiovascular toxicity or pre-existing risk factor prior to referral. The two most common cardiovascular toxicities documented during clinic review included Left Ventricular Dysfunction (LVD) and hypertension. Of note 3 (8.1%) patients had CTCAE grade III LVD. An additional 10 (27%) patients reviewed in clinic had CTCAE grade I hypertension. None of these patients had hypertension noted within their referral. Cascade testing for cardiac history was warranted in 2 (5.4%) of patients. Conclusions: Pediatric cardio-oncology clinics are likely beneficial to documenting previously unrecognised cardiotoxicity and relevant cardiac family histories, whilst providing an opportunity to address lifestyle risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toro et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Pediatric cancer with high risk for cardiovascular toxicity (n=37). Pediatric cardio-oncology clinic assessment was evaluated on Documented cardiovascular toxicity or pre-existing risk factor. A multidisciplinary pediatric cardio-oncology clinic identified documented cardiovascular toxicities or pre-existing risk factors in 54% of referred patients, most commonly left ventricular dysfunction and hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: