Key result
Men in passive jobs characterized by low demand and low control had a more than twofold increased risk of first nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to all other respondents (OR 2.33).
Why the study?
Do psychosocial work factors (job demand and control) affect the risk of first nonfatal myocardial infarction in men?
Case-Control (n=490)
Do psychosocial work factors (job demand and control) affect the risk of first nonfatal myocardial infarction in men?
Odds Ratio: 2.33 (95% CI 1.49–3.66)
Low job control and low job demand (passive jobs) are associated with an increased risk of first nonfatal myocardial infarction in Lithuanian men, contrasting with Western studies where high demand is typically a risk factor.
Passive jobs associated with higher MI risk in Lithuanian men; leaves open whether job strain effects differ regionally or need cohort confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: The association between job demand and job control and first nonfatal myocardial infarction was studied among the 25- to 64-year-old male population in Kaunas, Lithuania. METHODS: A translation of the Swedish version of the demand-control questionnaire was used. Both psychosocial work characteristics as independent risk factors and the possible effects of traditional risk factors (smoking, arterial hypertension, overweight) were analyzed in a case-control study among 203 men diagnosed in 2001-2002 with a first nonfatal myocardial infarction (cases) and 287 men randomly selected as controls. A logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio for developing myocardial infarction in relation to self-reported job demand and job control. Possible confounders (age, marital status, education, type of occupation, smoking, blood pressure, body mass index) were controlled. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio was 0.56 [95% confidence interval (95% CI 0.37-0.85)] and 1.53 (95% CI 1.04-2.38), for demand and control, respectively. That for workers with low demand and low control was 1.89 (95% CI 0.99-3.60) as compared with low demand and high control. The risk of myocardial infarction for men in passive jobs (low demand and low control) was twofold that of the other respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The association between low job control and the risk of myocardial infarction was found to be consistent with research in western populations. In contradiction, however, to findings in western studies, low demand, rather than high demand proved to be a risk factor for 25- to 64-year-old men. Employees in passive jobs had the highest risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malinauskienė et al. (2005) conducted a case-control in First nonfatal myocardial infarction (n=490). Passive jobs (low demand and low control) vs. All other respondents was evaluated on First nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.49-3.66). Men in passive jobs characterized by low demand and low control had a more than twofold increased risk of first nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to all other respondents (OR 2.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: