Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A retrospective cohort study determined the risk and cost of gastrointestinal side effects associated with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for an at-risk period from January 1, 1985, through March 31, 1985. Overall relative risk, adjusted for sex and race, was 2.52 (95% confidence interval, 2.25 to 2.82) and varied from 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 2.91) for duodenal ulcer to 3.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.40 to 7.66) for gastrointestinal bleeding. After deleting cases with a history of steroid or anticoagulant use or an alcohol-related diagnosis, adjusted relative risk was 2.58 (95% confidence interval, 2.29 to 2.90) and varied from 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 2.89) for all other cases of peptic ulcer to 2.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 4.46) for disorders of stomach function. There was a bimodal distribution of expenditures of Medicaid-paid gastrointestinal side effects. Most patients had low hospitalization costs, but an important minority had high hospitalization costs. Median ambulatory treatment costs during the 3-month study period for persons with gastrointestinal side effects was $27 and varied from $14 for those diagnosed as having nausea, vomiting, or heartburn to $393 for those diagnosed as having gastrointestinal bleeding. Median inpatient costs were $2006 and ranged from $1487 for persons with nausea, vomiting, or heartburn to $2486 for those with duodenal ulcer. For patients who had undergone an inpatient surgical procedure other than endoscopy alone, median hospital costs were $7209. An approximately twofold increase in payment for the same services would be expected if private third-party payers were responsible for the bill.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernard S. Bloom (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: