Key result
In the superior vagal ganglion of pigs, the majority of neurons were medium-sized (52%), with the most abundant neuropeptide expression being CGRP (57%) and VACHT (26%).
This study maps the neuropeptide expression and size distribution of neurons in the porcine superior vagal ganglion.
Porcine SVG mapping warrants no clinical translation yet; leaves open comparative neuroanatomy for human vagal therapies.
The study was carried out on three 4-month old female pigs. All the animals were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 4% buffered paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4). Left and right superior vagal ganglia (SVG) were collected and processed for immunofluorescence labeling method. The preparations were examined under a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope equipped with adequate filter block. Neurons forming SVG were round or oval in shape with a round nucleus in the center. The majority of them (52%) were medium (M) (31-50 μm in diameter) while 7% and 41% were small (S) (up to 30μm in diameter) or large (L) (above 50 μm in diameter) in size, respectively. Double-labeling immunofluorescence revealed that SVG neurons stained for CGRP (approx. 57%; among them 37%, 9% and 54% were M, S and L in size, respectively), SP (14.5%; 72.4% M, 3.4% S, 24.2% L), VACHT (26%; 63% M, 24% S and 13% L), GAL (14%; 57% M, 29% S, 14% L), NPY (12%; 53% M, 12% S, 35% L), Met-Enk (5%; 40% M, 6% S and 54% L), PACAP (15%; 52% M, 24% S and 24% L), VIP (6.3%; 67% M, 8% S and 25% L), and NOS-positive (6%; 31% M and 69% L). The most abundant populations of intraganglionic nerve fibers were those which stained for CGRP or GAL, whereas only single SP-, PACAP- or Met-ENK-positive nerve terminals were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sienkiewicz et al. (2017) studied this question. In the superior vagal ganglion of pigs, the majority of neurons were medium-sized (52%), with the most abundant neuropeptide expression being CGRP (57%) and VACHT (26%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: