Investigates thermal comfort in Mediterranean homes, suggesting adaptive strategies improve conditions.
This study investigates thermal comfort in residential buildings in Koper, Slovenia, located in a Mediterranean climate zone. The ASHRAE Class II protocol was employed, combining questionnaire-based surveys and field measurements to assess both subjective and objective indoor environmental parameters. A total of 580 valid responses were collected from 16 buildings between 2020 and 2021. The preferred temperature identified in this study was 21.2°C, which falls within the recommended range, whereas Griffith's comfort temperature was 19.8°C, slightly below the lower limit. Furthermore, the TSV index consistently exceeded PMV predictions, reinforcing the need for adaptive comfort models. The study also highlights critical indoor air quality issues: 83% of CO₂ measurements exceeded recommended thresholds, and 98% of humidity readings were outside optimal ranges in winter. The analysis of TSV (Thermal Sensation Votes) confirmed that respondents' preferred temperature is 21.2°C. The highest percentage, 97% of respondents, felt comfortable within the range of 19.5–20°C. The findings provide practical implications for building design and operation by demonstrating the importance of adaptive comfort strategies, ventilation practices, and climate-responsive renovation measures. The study provides evidence to support refining thermal comfort regulations and building standards based on local climatic conditions and occupant behaviour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dovjak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: