Qualitative study examines workplace incivility impacts in veterinary professionals, suggesting management improvements.
Background This study explores the impact of workplace incivility on veterinary professionals, coping strategies at various levels, and variations dependent on context to provide practical recommendations for organisational management of incivility. Methods Semi‐structured interviews based on the critical incident technique were employed, involving 18 veterinary professionals in various contexts and roles at participating organisations in the UK. The qualitative data were analysed using conventional content analysis. Results The findings indicate adverse impacts of incivility, with organisational‐level implications for quitting, team dynamics and patient safety. Existing organisational‐level mitigation strategies included fostering civility, feedback sessions and education. Participating receptionists and students reportedly experienced more incivility than veterinarians and nurses. Equine veterinarians faced increased incivility at events and due to insurance implications. In teaching settings, participants highlighted the need for student‐based interventions. Limitations The data are qualitative, making causality difficult to determine. Furthermore, the findings may not be more widely generalisable. Conclusion Concerned veterinary practices are recommended to review their incivility management system and improve clarity of existing processes. Equine clinics may gain from providing personalised resources, while teaching hospitals may benefit from building psychological safety and modelling appropriate responses to incivility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: