Investigates blast impact on reinforced concrete walls, suggesting optimal boundary element arrangements.
This study investigates the blast response of reinforced concrete (RC) walls with varying boundary element (BE) configurations using a validated macro-model implemented in OpenSees. The model, based on embedded layered-shell elements, was verified against independent experimental and numerical benchmarks, demonstrating its ability to capture out-of-plane wall response and BE-specific behavior under blast loading. A systematic parametric investigation was conducted to evaluate the effects of BE placement and thickness, boundary conditions, reinforcement ratios, axial loading, and wall aspect ratios. Results show that a single central BE can enhance blast resistance by approximately 20%, while configurations with two BEs placed at 0.2 times the wall length (BW2) offer the highest efficiency among multi-BE layouts. Increasing the BE thickness to 35 cm provided the best balance of performance and material demand. Vertical web reinforcement significantly improved behavior, while horizontal reinforcement had a limited effect. Higher BE reinforcement ratios further reduced displacements, whereas axial loads reduced global displacement but led to increased localized compressive damage. Fragility curves revealed variations of up to 33.9% in collapse probability across configurations, particularly under moderate impulse levels. Pressure–impulse (P–I) diagrams were developed to enable rapid identification of performance thresholds for different BE arrangements. The findings offer design-oriented guidance for optimizing BE configurations in the blast design of RC walls, with direct implications for improving structural resilience in critical infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: