Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reverse osmosis (RO) desalination operators time membrane clean-in-place (CIP) by non-site-calibrated vendor thresholds. We present an auditable workflow that converts these thresholds into plant-calibrated decision support. It pre-specifies the recovery target and analysis unit, compares candidate signals with a five-test label-free battery, and reports composite weights only when identifiable. Using ≈two years of routine 10 min SCADA from one three-train island seawater RO plant (≈600 m3 d−1), the battery selects normalised feed channel differential pressure (DP_norm) for site-specific cleaning-recovery review. On the false discovery rate (FDR)-effective unit (n = 14 campaigns), recovery is marginal and not FDR-significant (mid-p Benjamini–Hochberg q ≈ 0.141); DP_norm is therefore an operator-review signal, not an autonomous or FDR-confirmed trigger. The same battery invalidates a per-CIP-reset net driving pressure trigger as a clip-floor regression-to-the-mean artefact; it collapses under the pre-specified matched placebo and is reproduced by a fake-date null, a finding that is bounded to this plant and estimand, and not causal proof of a unique mechanism. The DP_norm of ≥1.20 review point is an exploratory, in-sample heuristic selected partly against the endogenous operator log, and its indexed economic comparison inherits that limitation. An identifiability-gated Bayesian power prior leaves the four-weight composite non-identifiable on this single-regime plant, pinning only the near-zero salt passage weight. The contribution is a bounded, estimand-based workflow that supports audit without replacing operators or the safety envelope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: