Reveals that KIR+ CD8+ Tregs suppress activated CD4+ T cells in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting potential for cell therapy.
Introduction CD8+T cells expressing NK cell receptors have regulatory function. We have shown that alloreactive CD4+T cells upregulate Qa-1 (human HLA-E) stress-peptide complex in mice, enabling elimination by Qa-1—restricted Ly49+CD8+Tregs and promoting graft survival. We hypothesized that analogous human CD8+Tregs exist, express killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR), are enriched in graft rejection, can be expanded, and suppress HLA-E—upregulated alloimmune CD4+ T cells. Methods Cryopreserved PBMCs from kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with no rejection (NR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), acute cell-mediated rejection (ACR), lupus nephritis, and healthy controls (HC) were phenotyped by flow cytometry. KIR+CD8+T cells from healthy apheresis leukoreduction samples were used to study in vitro expansion and CD4+T-cell suppression. In human kidney organoid (HKO) humanized murine (NSG-BLT) model, KIR+CD8+T cells were isolated to assess ex vivo expansion and suppression of alloreactive CD4+T cells. Results Inhibitory KIR (iKIR) are homologous to murine Ly49 in CD8+ Tregs. In KTRs, frequency of iKIR+ CD8+Tregs were significantly higher in AMR than HC. KIR2DL2/3 and KIR3DL1 subsets of iKIR+CD8+Tregs were most enriched. KIR2DL2/3+KIR3DL1+CD8+Tregs(CD8+Tregs) were enriched in alloimmunity compared to HC and demonstrated effector memory phenotype. IL-15-dependent in vitro expansion of FACS-sorted CD8+Tregs >50-fold in 3weeks while maintaining perforin and granzyme-B expression. In vitro expanded CD8+Tregs suppressed activated HLA-E—upregulated CD4+T cells significantly more in the presence of peptide. In a humanized murine transplant model (HKO-NSG-BLT), we showed that ex vivo—expanded CD8+Tregs eliminated alloreactive CD4+T cells in an antigen-dependent manner. Conclusion In alloimmunity, KIR+CD8+Tregs form a distinct subset of T cells enriched during rejection and suppress activated CD4+T cells in vivo and ex vivo, supporting their development as cell therapy against allograft rejection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: