Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study evaluated a new probe for measuring water content, indicating its efficacy for precise monitoring.
Water-content changes in the upper few centimeters control the evaporation response, but this layer is difficult to measure at millimeter-scale spacing. We evaluated a printed-circuit-board-based multi-TDR probe (MTP) in a homogeneous sand column. The probe has eight three-wire measurement sections at depths of 0.28–2.52 cm. Electric-field simulation showed that the response of each section was localized around the embedded conductors, so the measured permittivity had to be treated as a probe-specific response. Calibration against gravimetrically determined water content confirmed that the εMTP–θ relationship differed from the standard Topp equation and required section-specific calibration. The calibrated MTP estimates agreed with the gravimetric reference values, with R2 = 0.996 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.0075 m3 m−3. During evaporation, MTP-derived profiles in the upper 0–30 mm were compared with HYDRUS-1D simulations constrained by pressure-head, mass-loss, and water-retention data. The MTP–HYDRUS comparison gave a pooled RMSE of 0.0376 m3 m−3 and a weighted mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0282 m3 m−3, with the largest differences in the upper 0–20 mm. The results indicate that the MTP can provide independent millimeter-scale water-content profiles for checking near-surface water redistribution and for identifying depths where simulated surface-layer θ profiles depart from direct observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tokumoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: