Cross-sectional analysis finds dietary diversity reduces frailty severity in older adults, indicating nutritional importance.
Background: Dietary diversity has been proposed as a modifiable determinant of healthy ageing, but its association with objectively assessed frailty in geriatric outpatients remains poorly characterised. We examined the cross-sectional association between a four-item Dietary Diversity Score (DDS) and frailty severity, and whether nutritional status statistically mediates this association. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 317 older adults (median age 82 years, 73.8% female) attending a geriatric outpatient unit in Northern Italy. Consumption of four food groups (dairy, legumes/eggs, meat/fish/poultry, fruits/vegetables) was summed into a DDS (0–4). Frailty was measured with the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS). Mediation by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was tested with bootstrapping; individual food-group associations across eight outcomes were corrected for multiple testing (Benjamini–Hochberg). Results: Each additional food group was associated with a 0.61-point-lower EFS score after adjusting for age, sex and BMI (β = −0.608; p = 0.001; adjusted R2 ≈ 0.04–0.07) and 36% lower odds of higher frailty severity (OR = 0.64; p < 0.001). MNA statistically explained 86.2% of the DDS-EFS association (bootstrap 95%CI excluding zero), and the significant mediation paths remained robust after FDR correction (q ≤ 0.0015). Legumes/eggs showed the strongest food-specific association with EFS and MNA after correction (q ≤ 0.002); fruit/vegetable associations with inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers did not survive correction and are exploratory. Conclusions: Dietary diversity is associated with lower frailty severity in geriatric outpatients, largely explained by nutritional status; the modest explanatory power reflects frailty’s multifactorial aetiology, and prospective studies are needed to test causality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: