Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates dynamic responses and penetration behavior of Al/Ep composites in composite materials, indicating significant strength and strain-rate sensitivity.
Al/Ep composites cast with braided metal-wire skeleton tubular structures exhibit promising potential for hard-target penetration applications due to their synergistic combination of structural reinforcement and energetic-material characteristics. This study systematically investigated the dynamic compressive responses of steel-wire and tungsten-wire skeleton tubes with Al/Ep mass ratios of 3:7, 4:6, and 5:5 using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests over an overall strain-rate range of 300–1200 s -1 , together with the penetration damage behavior of a tungsten-wire skeleton tubular projectile against a thick concrete target. The experimental results revealed strain-rate sensitivity across all specimen groups. For the 3:7 specimens, the maximum failure strength and failure strain increased by 165.4% and 147.7%, respectively, in the steel-wire skeleton tubes as the strain rate increased from 300 to 1200 s -1 , and by 179.1% and 176.3%, respectively, in the tungsten-wire skeleton tubes over the range of 500–1200 s -1 . The specimens with Al/Ep mass ratios of 4:6 and 5:5 showed the same strain-rate-sensitive trend, although the magnitude of the increase depended on the mass ratio and skeleton material. At a strain rate of 1200 s -1 , both the maximum failure strength and failure strain decreased with increasing Al/Ep mass ratio, while the tungsten-wire skeleton tubes consistently exhibited higher values than the corresponding steel-wire skeleton tubes. A phenomenological polynomial constitutive model was established to interpolate the dynamic compressive responses within the strain-rate tested range. In the penetration test conducted at an impact velocity of 240.67 m/s, the projectile penetrated the concrete target to a depth of 120 mm and produced a damaged region measuring approximately 300 mm × 200 mm. The simulated penetration depth was 125.3 mm, corresponding to a relative error of 4.42%, supporting the applicability of the numerical model for interpreting the present penetration process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: