Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines political information sources and trust levels in adolescents, suggesting new dynamics in information authority.
In social media environments, new actors have emerged who curate political information for adolescents and potentially challenge the status of traditional information sources. Drawing from the frameworks of political socialization and curated information flows, this study examines adolescents’ political information behaviors, with a particular focus on social media and their (mis-)trust in various information sources. To that aim, we conducted 47 peer group discussions with N = 232 adolescents between 12 and 19 years using eliciting materials provided via data donations of political content encountered by adolescents. The study took place in 2024 amid multiple national and international elections. The findings reveal a reconfigured information authority where traditional institutions maintain informational trust but must adapt to platform logics and ideological filtering, resulting in a shared – yet asymmetrical – authority between legacy media and emerging actors such as influencers. The study provides novel and nuanced insights into adolescents’ exposure, engagement with, and trust in political information in curated information environments and their embedment in traditional socialization processes. The findings show that adolescents function as intermediaries, who transmit and reinterpret political information from curated information environments to peers and family networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klesl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: