Evaluates perceptions of digital technologies across EU member states, indicating varied public opinions.
Digital technologies are reshaping economies, labor markets, social security systems, and societal well-being across the European Union, increasing the need for decision-support methods capable of systematically analyzing complex survey evidence. This study proposes B-MIDIA, a parametric extension of the belief-structure TOPSIS framework that integrates the MIDIA (Multi-Criteria Method Integrating Distances to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points) aggregation mechanism with belief-structure-based multi-criteria decision analysis. The framework preserves the ordinal structure of survey responses and follows the standard belief-structure representation adopted in B-TOPSIS, in which uncertain (“Don’t know”) responses are incorporated into the evaluation through the normalization procedure. Using published country-level response distributions from Special Eurobarometer 554, the study evaluates public perceptions of recent digital technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), across EU Member States in five domains: the economy, society, quality of life, current job, and social security benefits. Sensitivity analyses performed for alternative values of the aggregation parameter α, together with comparisons with the benchmark B-TOPSIS rankings, demonstrate the robustness of the proposed aggregation mechanism within the adopted belief-structure framework. Across most dimensions, Lithuania and Malta achieved the highest evaluations, whereas France, Italy, and Romania generally ranked among the lowest. Economic and employment-related evaluations formed the central perception structure and were strongly associated with quality-of-life assessments. The proposed framework extends the analytical capabilities of belief-structure TOPSIS by enabling systematic sensitivity analysis of aggregation assumptions while preserving methodological compatibility with the original framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ewa Roszkowska (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: