Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed methods research shows participation in resuscitation events improves nurses’ CPR self-efficacy and attitudes, implying enhanced training is beneficial.
Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the cornerstone of acute response to cardiac arrest. Psychosocial factors, such as self-efficacy and attitudes toward CPR, play an important role in determining whether and how effectively nurses perform under the intense pressures of a real cardiac arrest. Objectives: To determine the impact of nurses’ participation in actual resuscitation events on their self-efficacy and attitudes toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods: A mixed-method study design was employed. Quantitatively, a cross-sectional survey of 362 nurses identified predictors of CPR attitudes and self-efficacy through regression analysis, while qualitatively semi-structured interviews with 20 nurses provided in-depth insights using Braun and Clarke’s thematic framework. Results: Quantitative findings indicate that only 37.6% of nurses demonstrated positive attitudes toward CPR, and 46.4% reported high self-efficacy. These were more prevalent among older, female, non-Saudi nurses with advanced qualifications, critical care experience, or prior exposure to CPR policies and training. Qualitative findings reinforced that real CPR experience boosts both confidence and attitude. Discussion: Participation in actual resuscitation events, awareness of institutional CPR policies, and completion of advanced CPR training significantly contribute to improving nurses’ attitudes and self-efficacy. This study emphasizes that structured education, regular training, and simulation improve nurses’ resuscitation skills, with tailored support boosting confidence and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayman Ateq Alamri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: