Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study analyzes efficacy and maintenance use of topical bexarotene in mycosis fungoides, indicating potential relapse delay.
Topical bexarotene 1% gel is an approved skin-directed treatment for refractory or persistent stage IA-IB cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, but real-world evidence in mycosis fungoides (MF), particularly regarding maintenance use after complete response, remains limited. We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients with histopathologically and immunohistochemically confirmed, previously treated stage IA-IB MF who received topical bexarotene between 2009 and 2022. Clinical response, post-treatment biopsy findings, adverse events, maintenance therapy, and relapse outcomes were analyzed. The cohort included 31 women and 25 men; 42 patients (75.0%) had stage IA and 14 (25.0%) had stage IB disease. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 20 patients (35.7%) and partial response in 15 (26.8%), yielding an overall response rate of 62.5%. Overall response was higher in stage IA than in stage IB disease (73.8% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.003) and in T1a than in T2a disease (77.1% vs. 36.4%; p = 0.044). All biopsied complete responders showed no MF-compatible histology. Adverse events were exclusively local and manageable. Among 18 evaluable complete responders, relapse occurred in 15 (83.3%). Median time to relapse was longer with maintenance topical bexarotene than without maintenance (45 vs. 30 weeks; p = 0.039). Topical bexarotene appears effective and well tolerated in previously treated stage IA-IB MF, with greatest benefit in limited patch-stage disease. Maintenance use after CR may delay relapse, but this exploratory finding requires prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Memet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: