Randomized trial evaluates roundabout performance in varying conditions, indicating potential design improvements.
Compared to conventional signalised intersections, roundabouts are increasingly recognised for their ability to improve traffic safety and operational efficiency. However, accurately modelling their complex traffic dynamics remains challenging, particularly in multilane configurations characterised by lane-changing manoeuvres and gap-acceptance interactions. This study presents a behaviour-driven microscopic simulation framework based on agent-based modelling (ABM) for evaluating roundabout performance under varying geometric and traffic demand conditions. In the proposed framework, each vehicle is represented as an autonomous agent capable of route selection, yielding, lane-changing, and speed adaptation according to predefined behavioural rules. This enables a detailed representation of local traffic interactions and operational conflicts that are not fully captured by traditional aggregate traffic models. The simulation environment is used to analyse idealised one-, two-, and three-lane roundabout configurations and to assess the operational impact of targeted geometric modifications. The proposed methodology is further validated using real-world traffic data collected from the Brașov Central Roundabout, Romania. Simulation results demonstrate that the ABM framework can realistically reproduce traffic throughput, average speed, number of stops, and travel time under high traffic demand conditions. Furthermore, the introduction of a channelised right-turn lane resulted in measurable operational improvements, including increased average speed and reduced delay. The findings highlight the applicability of agent-based simulation as a decision-support tool for roundabout design, traffic management, and infrastructure optimisation, contributing to safer and more efficient urban mobility systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: