Key result
High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation linked to ~14% higher force-time integral and ablation index versus standard ventilation.
Why the study?
Although high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation improves procedural outcomes, lesion-level evidence in the era of contact force-guided ablation remains limited.
Does high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation improve force-time integral and ablation index during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cohort
No
Does high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation improve force-time integral and ablation index during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation during pulmonary vein isolation is associated with higher force-time integral and ablation index compared to standard ventilation, suggesting improved lesion formation metrics.
HFLTVV was associated with improved lesion metrics in AF ablation; leaves open outcome benefits pending prospective trials.
Introduction In catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), durable lesion formation is essential for successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Force–time integral (FTI) is an established lesion metric that reflects the cumulative effect of contact force (CF) and radiofrequency (RF) application time and has been associated with lesion durability. Although high‐frequency low–tidal volume ventilation (HFLTVV) has been associated with improved procedural outcomes, lesion‐level evidence in the era of contact force‐guided ablation remains limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between HFLTVV and lesion metrics during PVI. Methods and Results This single‐center retrospective study included patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing first‐time RF PVI. Procedures were performed during the standard ventilation (SV) and the HFLTVV eras, with CF targeted at 10–12 g. Lesion parameters, including RF application time, average CF, ablation index (AI), FTI, and impedance drop, were extracted from CARTONET and analyzed overall and by pulmonary vein region. Respiratory effects were assessed using arterial blood gas analysis. Compared with SV, HFLTVV was associated with significantly higher FTI and AI (FTI: 268.8 ± 31.5 vs 235.2 ± 21.7 g·s; AI: 459.0 ± 16.8 vs 437.1 ± 13.4; both p <0.001), despite similar CF and RF application time. Findings were consistent across pulmonary vein regions. In multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics, HFLTVV remained independently associated with higher FTI and AI (both p <0.001). Procedural duration and arrhythmia recurrence were similar between groups. Arterial blood gas analysis demonstrated no clinically significant CO 2 retention. Conclusion HFLTVV was associated with higher FTI and AI under comparable CF and RF application time. These findings suggest that HFLTVV may influence lesion metrics during AF ablation and warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shigematsu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation (HFLTVV) vs. Standard ventilation (SV) was evaluated on Force-time integral (FTI) (p=<0.001). High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation was associated with significantly higher force-time integral (268.8 vs 235.2 g·s) and ablation index compared with standard ventilation (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: