Key result
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily was cost saving compared with enoxaparin 40 mg once daily, with savings of £62 to £274 per patient.
Why the study?
Is dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily cost-effective compared to enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for VTE prevention in patients over 75 years or with moderate renal impairment undergoing total knee or hip replacement?
Is dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily cost-effective compared to enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for VTE prevention in patients over 75 years or with moderate renal impairment undergoing total knee or hip replacement?
Effect estimate: cost savings of £62 to £274
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily is cost-saving compared to enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for VTE prevention in older patients or those with moderate renal impairment undergoing joint replacement in the UK.
May support cost savings with dabigatran in this UK subgroup; extends economic models but leaves open broader adoption.
Oral dabigatran etexilate is indicated for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing total knee replacement or total hip replacement. We investigated the cost-effectiveness of the 150 mg once daily (od) dose recommended for patients aged over 75 or with moderate renal impairment, from a United Kingdom National Health Service perspective. Dabigatran etexilate was compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg od, using a decision model. Risks for VTE and bleeding were derived from subgroup analyses of the phase III trials. Dabigatran etexilate was less costly than enoxaparin; cost savings varied from pound62 to pound274 (base-case analyses) and were primarily due to differences in administration costs. Results were robust across a range of sensitivity analyses. Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg od is cost saving compared with enoxaparin 40 mg od in patients aged over 75years and in patients with moderate renal impairment, with comparable efficacy and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roskell et al. (2009) studied Venous thromboembolism prevention. Dabigatran etexilate vs. Subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness (cost savings of £62 to £274). Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily was cost saving compared with enoxaparin 40 mg once daily, with savings of £62 to £274 per patient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: