Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 1, 1991The Journal of Urology

Comparison of Endoscopic and Radiological Residual Fragment Rate following Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JDJohn D. DenstedtWestern UniversityRCRalph V. ClaymanNorthwestern UniversityDPDaniel PicusWashington University in St. Louis

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Denstedt et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6b0d08050bc01bbbcb53bahttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38429-x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Calculi in Lower Pole Calices1989 · 58 citations
  2. 2Critical Evaluation of Treatment of Staghorn Calculi by Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy1989 · 66 citations
  3. 3Report of the United States Cooperative Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy1986 · 690 citations
  4. 4Combined Percutaneous and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Staghorn Calculi: An Alternative to Anatrophic Nephrolithotomy1986 · 154 citations