Key result
Transesophageal pacing in sick sinus syndrome yielded similar sinus cycle length and corrected sinus node recovery time as endocavitary stimulation, but prolonged sinoatrial conduction time (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does transesophageal pacing reliably assess sinus node function compared to endocavitary stimulation in patients with sick sinus syndrome?
Observational (n=34)
Does transesophageal pacing reliably assess sinus node function compared to endocavitary stimulation in patients with sick sinus syndrome?
Transesophageal pacing influences autonomic tone but does not cause important variations in sinus node measures, suggesting it may be a reliable alternative to endocavitary stimulation for assessing sinus node function.
May support transesophageal pacing as alternative for sinus node assessment; leaves open equivalence to endocavitary stimulation.
The purpose of this study was to find out whether transesophageal pacing could be utilized for assessment of sinus node function in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). In 17 patients with SSS (study group) we compared the results of sinus node tests obtained both in the basal state and after pharmacological autonomic blockade by endocavitary stimulation and, 24 hours later, by transesophageal pacing. In another group of 17 patients with SSS (control group), we compared the results obtained by two endocavitary studies. In "study group", sinus cycle length (SCL) and corrected sinus node recovery time (CSRT) did not show significant differences between the two studies both in the basal state and after autonomic blockade, whereas sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) was more prolonged during esophageal pacing (P less than 0.01). In "control group", sinus node measures did not show significant differences between the two studies. In the "study group," the following coefficients of correlation were obtained in the basal state; SCL, r = 0.65, CSRT, r = 0.57, SACT, r = 0.52 and after autonomic blockade: SCL, r = 0.95, CSRT, r = 0.62 and SACT, r = 0.53. In the basal state, the correlation for SCL and CSRT between the two studies was lower in the "study group" than in the "control group" (P less than 0.05), whereas after autonomic blockade the correlation for sinus node measures did not show significant differences between the two groups of patients. These data suggest that transesophageal study influences the autonomic tone regulating the sinus node; however, it is not responsible for important variations in sinus node measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alboni et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) (n=34). Transesophageal pacing vs. Endocavitary stimulation was evaluated on Sinus node function measures (sinus cycle length, corrected sinus node recovery time, sinoatrial conduction time) (p=<0.01). Transesophageal pacing in sick sinus syndrome yielded similar sinus cycle length and corrected sinus node recovery time as endocavitary stimulation, but prolonged sinoatrial conduction time (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: