Key result
4D volume ICE for left atrial appendage closure guidance showed moderate correlation with TEE for device sizing (r=0.63-0.71, p<0.05), but had a lower imaging success rate (67% vs 100%).
Why the study?
Fluoroscopy and TEE guide transcatheter LAA closure, but whether 4D volume ICE can serve as an alternative to TEE during the procedure remained to be examined.
Does 4D volume ICE provide comparable intraprocedural measurements to TEE during transcatheter LAA closure in patients with AF?
Observational (n=15)
Does 4D volume ICE provide comparable intraprocedural measurements to TEE during transcatheter LAA closure in patients with AF?
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 100%
4D volume ICE provides comparable intraprocedural sizing to TEE for LAA closure, but has a lower imaging success rate, highlighting the need for optimal patient selection and preprocedural planning.
4D ICE needs validation before routine LAA closure use; leaves open optimized protocols in selected AF patients.
BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are used to guide transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure in patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent thromboembolic events. This study examines whether real-time three-dimensional volume ICE guidance (4D volume ICE) can be used as an alternative to TEE during LAA closure (LAAC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), who had high risk for stroke and contraindication for long-term warfarin therapy, were enrolled in the study. The WATCHMAN device was used for transcatheter LAAC under fluoroscopy. LAA and device sizing was performed using TEE and volume ICE guidance from the right heart. Intraprocedural ICE measurements were consistent with TEE; LAA maximal width and depth, and maximal diameter of the implanted device were moderately correlated (Pearson's coefficient: 0.63, 0.65, and 0.71 respectively; p<0.05) with good agreement (bias: -0.03 cm, -0.07 cm, and 0.003 cm respectively). The average imaging success rate, defined by the number of patients with all the required intraprocedural measurements, was 67% for ICE and 100% for TEE. The WATCHMAN device was successfully implanted in all patients with a device to patient ratio of 1.33. CONCLUSIONS: 4D volume ICE can be used as an intraprocedural sizing and guidance tool for transcatheter LAAC with measurements comparable to TEE. Challenging patient characteristics significantly degrade the diagnostic image quality when imaging from the right heart. Standardized workflow with proper patient selection and optimal preprocedural planning may improve the diagnostic quality of volume ICE guidance for transcatheter LAAC procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalili et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=15). 4D volume intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Average imaging success rate. 4D volume ICE for left atrial appendage closure guidance showed moderate correlation with TEE for device sizing (r=0.63-0.71, p<0.05), but had a lower imaging success rate (67% vs 100%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: