Key result
A successful transition from middle- to long-distance running was associated with a significantly higher endurance genetic distance score compared to a nonsuccessful transition (37.1 vs 23.3; P<0.005).
Why the study?
Does an aerobic-favoring genetic profile predict the success of a shift from middle- to long-distance running in elite athletes?
Observational (n=13)
Does an aerobic-favoring genetic profile predict the success of a shift from middle- to long-distance running in elite athletes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aerobic genetic profile was associated with successful distance transition in small elite cohort; leaves open predictive utility for training guidance or talent ID.
The aim of the study was to assess whether an aerobic-favoring genetic profile can predict the success of a shift from middle- to long-distance running. Thirteen elite middle-distance runners were divided into successful and nonsuccessful groups in their shift toward long-distance runs. All the runners began their training program at the age of 14-15, and after 6-7 years, changed focus and adjusted their training program to fit longer running distances. The participants' personal records in the longer events were set at the age of 25-27, about 3-5 years after the training readjustment took place. The endurance genetic score based on 9 polymorphisms was computed as the endurance genetic distance score (EGDS9). The power genetic distance score (PGDS5) was computed based on 5 power-related genetic polymorphisms. The mean EGDS9 was significantly higher among the successful group than the nonsuccessful group (37.1 and 23.3, respectively, p < .005, effect size 0.75), while the mean PGDS5 was not statistically different between the 2 groups (p = .13). Our findings suggest the possible use of genetic profiles as an added tool for determining appropriate competitive transition and specialization in young athletes involved in early phases of talent development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben‐Zaken et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Elite middle-distance runners (n=13). Successful shift to long-distance runs vs. Nonsuccessful shift to long-distance runs was evaluated on Endurance genetic distance score (EGDS9) (effect size 0.75, p=<.005). A successful transition from middle- to long-distance running was associated with a significantly higher endurance genetic distance score compared to a nonsuccessful transition (37.1 vs 23.3; P<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: