Salinity and drought tolerance of mannitol‐accumulating transgenic tobacco

ABSTRACT Tobacco plants ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) were transformed with a mannitol‐1‐phosphate dehydrogenase gene resulting in mannitol accumulation. Experiments were conducted to determine whether mannitol provides salt and/or drought stress protection through osmotic adjustment. Non‐stressed transgenic plants were 20–25% smaller than non‐stressed, non‐transformed (wild‐type) plants in both salinity and drought experiments. However, salt stress reduced dry weight in wild‐type plants by 44%, but did not reduce the dry weight of transgenic plants. Transgenic plants adjusted osmotically by 0.57 MPa, whereas wild‐type plants did not adjust osmotically in response to salt stress. Calculations of solute contribution to osmotic adjustment showed that mannitol contributed only 0‐003‐0‐004 MPa to the 0.2 MPa difference in full turgor osmotic potential (π o ) between salt‐stressed transgenic and wild‐type plants. Assuming a cytoplasmic location for mannitol and that the cytoplasm constituted 5% of the total water volume, mannitol accounted for only 30–40% of the change in π o of the cytoplasm. Inositol, a naturally occurring polyol in tobacco, accumulated in response to salt stress in both transgenic and wild‐type plants, and was 3‐fold more abundant than mannitol in transgenic plants. Drought stress reduced the leaf relative water content, leaf expansion, and dry weight of transgenic and wild‐type plants. However, π o was not significantly reduced by drought stress in transgenic or wild‐type plants, despite an increase in non‐structural carbohydrates and mannitol in droughted plants. We conclude that (1) mannitol was a relatively minor osmolyte in transgenic tobacco, but may have indirectly enhanced osmotic adjustment and salt tolerance; (2) inositol cannot substitute for mannitol in this role; (3) slower growth of the transgenic plants, and not the presence of mannitol per se , may have been the cause of greater salt tolerance, and (4) mannitol accumulation was enhanced by drought stress but did not affect π o or drought tolerance.