Key result
A notched P wave at baseline was a significant predictor of long-term cardiovascular events in a community-dwelling population (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.08-2.33).
Why the study?
Does a notched P wave on baseline ECG predict cardiovascular events in a community-dwelling population?
Case-Control (n=2,104)
Does a notched P wave on baseline ECG predict cardiovascular events in a community-dwelling population?
Odds Ratio: 1.59 (95% CI 1.08–2.33)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.1% vs 6%
p-value: p=0.001
A notched P wave on a standard ECG is an independent predictor of long-term cardiovascular events in a community-dwelling population, particularly in those without left ventricular hypertrophy.
May flag higher CV risk on routine ECG but should not yet change practice; leaves open prospective validation in community cohorts.
BACKGROUND: There have been few reports on the relationship between P-wave characteristics and long-term cardiovascular events. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted as part of the Jichi Medical School cohort study, which enrolled 12,490 subjects in a community-dwelling population. The mean follow-up period was 10.7 years. The P-wave characteristics of 526 patients who suffered cardiovascular events (fatal/nonfatal stroke, fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, and sudden death) within the follow-up period (case group) were compared with those of 1578 matched controls (control group). The P-wave morphology was classified as normal, deflected, and notched type in precordial leads. A broad P wave was defined as a maximum P-wave duration of more than 120 ms in any of the 12 leads. RESULTS: The mean age was 64 ± 8 years and the percentage of males was 54% in both groups. A notched P wave at baseline was observed in 10.1% of the case group and 6.0% of the control group (P = 0.001). A notched P wave was a significant predictor of cardiovascular events after adjustment for covariates (odds ratio = 1.59; 95% confidence interval = 1.08-2.33). Among the patients with left ventricular hypertrophy as evaluated by the Sokolow-Lyon criteria or Cornell product criteria, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular events between those with and those without a notched P wave, but in the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy, patients with a notched P wave suffered more cardiovascular events than those without a notched P wave by each criteria. CONCLUSION: P-wave morphologic characteristics were effective for predicting cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kabutoya et al. (2012) conducted a case-control in Cardiovascular events (n=2,104). Notched P wave vs. Absence of a notched P wave was evaluated on Cardiovascular events (fatal/nonfatal stroke, fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, and sudden death) (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.33, p=0.001). A notched P wave at baseline was a significant predictor of long-term cardiovascular events in a community-dwelling population (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.08-2.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: