Key result
Cardiac cachexia is a complex multifactorial comorbidity in heart failure that requires early recognition and treatment to mitigate its negative impact on quality of life and prognosis.
Why the study?
Cardiac cachexia is a major, complex comorbidity in heart failure with a negative impact on quality of life and prognosis, making prevention, early recognition, and treatment essential.
Increased clinician awareness and early diagnosis of cardiac cachexia using imaging and biomarkers are essential for improving outcomes in heart failure patients.
Raises clinician awareness for cardiac cachexia in heart failure; leaves open optimal interventions pending prospective trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure is a frequent problem in an ageing population, associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Today, it is important to not only treat heart failure itself but also the related comorbidities. Among them, cardiac cachexia is one of the major challenges. It is a complex multifactorial disease with a negative impact on quality of life and prognosis. Therefore, prevention, early recognition and treatment of cardiac cachexia is essential. RECENT FINDINGS: Cardiac cachexia frequently presents with skeletal as well as heart muscle depletion. Imaging-based diagnostic techniques can help to identify patients with cardiac cachexia and muscle wasting. Several blood biomarkers are available to detect metabolic changes in cardiac cachexia. SUMMARY: Several studies are currently ongoing to better comprehend the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiac cachexia and to find new treatments. It is essential to diagnose it as early as possible to initiate therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lena et al. (2019) conducted a review in Heart failure and cardiac cachexia. Cardiac cachexia is a complex multifactorial comorbidity in heart failure that requires early recognition and treatment to mitigate its negative impact on quality of life and prognosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: