Key result
Six newly identified CaV2.2 interaction partners uniquely modulate channel function, with Grina/TMBIM3 showing a striking modulatory effect comparable to G-protein regulation.
Why the study?
CaV2.2 channels play a key role in signal transmission and pain perception, making them important targets for pharmacological inhibitors and novel modulatory interactors.
This review highlights novel modulatory interactors of the CaV2.2 channel, which may serve as potential targets for pharmacological inhibition, particularly in pain perception.
Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels are typically integrated in a complex network of protein-protein-interactions, also referred to as Ca2+ channel nanodomains. Amongst the neuronal CaV2 channel family, CaV2.2 is of particular importance due to its general role for signal transmission from the periphery to the central nervous system, but also due to its significance for pain perception. Thus, CaV2.2 is an ideal target candidate to search for pharmacological inhibitors but also for novel modulatory interactors. In this review we summarize the last years findings of our intense screenings and characterization of the six CaV2.2 interaction partners, tetraspanin-13 (TSPAN-13), reticulon 1 (RTN1), member 1 of solute carrier family 38 (SLC38), prostaglandin D2 synthase (PTGDS), transmembrane protein 223 (TMEM223), and transmembrane BAX inhibitor motif 3 (Grina/TMBIM3) containing protein. Each protein shows a unique way of channel modulation as shown by extensive electrophysiological studies. Amongst the newly identified interactors, Grina/TMBIM3 is most striking due to its modulatory effect which is rather comparable to G-protein regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacinová et al. (2020) reported a review. CaV2.2 interaction partners was evaluated. Six newly identified CaV2.2 interaction partners uniquely modulate channel function, with Grina/TMBIM3 showing a striking modulatory effect comparable to G-protein regulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: